Brutus essays anti-federalist

The productions of the different parts of the union are very variant, and their interests, of consequence, diverse.

Brutus (Antifederalist)

These papers argued against the new Constitution, then being considered for ratification by the states. Representation Brutus argues that a free republic cannot exist in such a large territory as the United States. Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

The territory of the United States is a vast extent. These are some of the reasons by which it appears, that a free republic cannot long subsist over a country of the great extent of these states. When these are attended with great honor and emolument, as they always will be in large states, so as greatly to interest men to pursue them, and to be proper objects for ambitious and designing men, such men will be ever restless in their pursuit after them.

In despotic governments, the supreme authority being lodged in one, his will is law, and can be as easily expressed to a large extensive territory as to a small one. And are by this clause invested with the power of making all laws, proper and necessary, for carrying all these into execution; and they may so exercise this power as entirely to annihilate all the state governments, and reduce this country to one single government.

So, clearly did not think much of a pluralist democracy. Suppose the legislature of a state should pass a law to raise money to support their government and pay the state debt, may the Congress repeal this law, because it may prevent the collection of a tax which they may think proper and necessary to lay, to provide for the general welfare of the United States?

ANTI-FEDERALIST PAPERS

He writes "no way is left to control them but with a high hand and an outstretched arm. Taken together, the Federalist and Antifederalist debates over the Constitution provide Americans with a deeply insightful conversation about politics, human nature, and the difficulties of establishing good government.

A free republic will never keep a standing army to execute its laws. At length a Convention of the states has been assembled, they have formed a constitution which will now, probably, be submitted to the people to ratify or reject, who are the fountain of all power, to whom alone it of right belongs to make or unmake constitutions, or forms of government, at their pleasure.

In the business therefore of laying and collecting taxes, the idea of confederation is totally lost, and that of one entire republic is embraced.

If respect is to be paid to the opinion of the greatest and wisest men who have ever thought or wrote on the science of government, we shall be constrained to conclude, that a free republic cannot succeed over a country of such immense extent, containing such a number of inhabitants, and these encreasing in such rapid progression as that of the whole United States.

So why are we trying so hard to do that today? If the constitution, offered to [your acceptance], be a wise one, calculated to preserve the invaluable blessings of liberty, to secure the inestimable rights of mankind, and promote human happiness, then, if you accept it, you will lay a lasting foundation of happiness for millions yet unborn; generations to come will rise up and call you blessed.

The weak central government could not raise taxes to cover war debts and was largely unable to pass legislation. One inferior court must be established, I presume, in each state at least, with the necessary executive officers appendant thereto.

In the Anti-Federalists papers Brutus states that it is human nature to want power, and by having one central government it would result in an absolute power.

In this situation, I trust the feeble efforts of an individual, to lead the minds of the people to a wise and prudent determination, cannot fail of being acceptable to the candid and dispassionate part of the community.

So far therefore as its powers reach, all ideas of confederation are given up and lost. In a republic of such vast extent as the United-States, the legislature cannot attend to the various concerns and wants of its different parts. In this situation, I trust the feeble efforts of an individual, to lead the minds of the people to a wise and prudent determination, cannot fail of being acceptable to the candid and dispassionate part of the community.

These are some of the reasons by which it appears, that a free republic cannot long subsist over a country of the great extent of these states. The question then will be, whether a government thus constituted, and founded on such principles, is practicable, and can be exercised over the whole United States, reduced into one state?

In a free republic, although all laws are derived from the consent of the people, yet the people do not declare their consent by themselves in person, but by representatives, chosen by them, who are supposed to know the minds of their constituents, and to be possessed of integrity to declare this mind.

So, once again, saying hey, this is a takeover, these 13 states are really becoming one state under the constitution. I beg the candid and dispassionate attention of my countrymen while I state these objections — they are such as have obtruded themselves upon my mind upon a careful attention to the matter, and such as I sincerely believe are well founded.

Their manners and habits differ as much as their climates and productions; and their sentiments are by no means coincident. Other common interest of the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist was the preservation of liberty and government.

Someone will go unrepresented. If the constitution, offered to your acceptance, be a wise one, calculated to preserve the invaluable blessings of liberty, to secure the inestimable rights of mankind, and promote human happiness, then, if you accept it, you will lay a lasting foundation of happiness for millions yet unborn; generations to come will rise up and call you blessed.

The essays were the product of a vast number of authors, working individually rather than as a group. Human nature makes it necessary for this type of system. If this be not the case, there will be a constant clashing of opinions; and the representatives of one part will be continually striving against those of the other.

There are many objections, of small moment, of which I shall take no notice — perfection is not to be expected in any thing that is the production of man — and if I did not in my conscience believe that this scheme was defective in the fundamental principles — in the foundation upon which a free and equal government must rest — I would hold my peace.

If this be not the case, there will be a constant clashing of opinions; and the representatives of one part will be continually striving against those of the other.On this day inan author writing under the pseudonym “Brutus” writes his first contribution to the anti-Federalist Papers.

These papers argued against the new Constitution, then being considered for ratification by the states. Brutus Essay XI 31 January The nature and extent of the judicial power of the United States, proposed to be granted by this constitution, claims our particular attention. This government is a complete system, not only for making, but for executing laws.

The anti-Federalist papers are a selection of the written arguments against the US Constitution by those known to posterity as the anti-Federalists. As with the Federalist papers, these essays were originally published in newspapers.

Brutus Essay XI 31 January The nature and extent of the judicial power of the United States, proposed to be granted by this constitution, claims our particular attention.

Brutus published 16 essays in the New-York Journal, and Weekly Register from October,through April,beginning shortly before The Federalist started appearing in New York newspapers. The essays were widely reprinted and commented on throughout the American states.

19 rows · The essays were widely reprinted and commented on throughout the American states. The author is thought by most scholars to have been Robert Yates, a New York judge, delegate to the Federal Convention, and political ally of anti-federalist New York Governor George Clinton.

Download
Brutus essays anti-federalist
Rated 0/5 based on 81 review