People would actually be less mad, because there is a system in place that gives weight to certain people, instead of just an arbitrary choice based on what someone feels. Saying that there are not people that are discriminated against due to race, sex, sexual orientation, or anything else that has reasonable grounds to be called "discrimination by culture" is a lie - for example, many Native American tribes are discriminated against just because they are Native Americans .
How do they measure discrimination, and what would qualify for being disadvantaged? Affirmative action was created to ensure fair admission practices and to rectify a long period of racial discrimination. Affirmative action is a way to help compensate for the fact that, due to many years of oppression, some races "started late in the race.
The past discrimination against certain minority groups does not justify present discrimination against non-minorities. School leaders in favor of affirmative action use racial diversity or economic reasons to support their stance. Although most higher education leaders support it, the general consensus of the American people is that affirmative action should be abolished in the college admissions process.
People would work harder through being discouraged because they are ensured that they have a possibility of actually being hired; this is what AA does. Affirmative action is a way to Affirmative action should be abolished essays that diversity is obtained and maintained in schools and in the workplace.
I'm not seeing how any of the other stuff relates to your contention, but I'll address it. Sorry for the crappy counter rebutall, I literally just typed this, 30 minutes before this was due, due to time constraint. Recently, there have been many positive steps taken towards the abolishment of affirmative action in the college admissions process.
People with the same skin color are not necessarily the same in opinion or even culture. My arguments, still stand however, because the definition isn't really different, when I compare to my original one. On the other hand, the administration drops an application from a white student despite the fact the he or she performed better than the black did.
Affirmative action is reverse discrimination. I find this statement baseless, because there really is no direct correlation that this was the actual reason for the decline. College helps prepare students to enter the American workforce and also aids students in life preparation.
There's no topicality to this argument, this is an argument based around dropout rates of African Americans because they were chosen unfairly and not in the spirit of AA - not AA itself.
These are my rebuttals. In so doing it also helps create tolerant communities because it exposes people to a variety of cultures and ideas that are different from their own. A solution to the first problem that aggravates the second is no solution at all.
So, my point still stands. Regarding racially diverse campuses he stated: Affirmative action policies do not necessarily help economically disadvantaged students.
This situation may bring out a sense of resentment whereby the white could resolve to curse the group she was born in, a fact that she has no control over.
Another commonly used reason for the preferential treatment of minorities in the admissions process is that affirmative action helps less fortunate blacks and Hispanics into college. Education Program Affirmative action policies are those in which an institution or organization actively engages in efforts to improve opportunities for historically excluded groups in American society.
Similarly, the situation may escalate to the older members of the society who may saw seeds of hatred among the society. This argument is succesfully refuted.
They are admitted because of the color of their skin. Educators believe that this difference in exam scores occurs primarily because many blacks and Hispanics are from "disadvantaged families or mediocre schools" Sanchez.
Of course there is discrimination by the culture or the structure at large, therefore AA still remains relevant C3.
For instance, American black women were given preferential attention in terms of employment just because they had been excluded from academies and work places in the past.
On top of that, Con needs to show me that that learning about different cultures outweighs somebodies chance of getting an education in the first place, because i already have shown that students can learn about different cultures through other ways.
Educators believe that this difference in exam scores occurs primarily because many blacks and Hispanics are from "disadvantaged families or mediocre schools" Sanchez.Should Affirmative Action be abolished?
Why or why not?
To substantiate your position, please reference at least three pivotal cases involving Affirmative Action and explain the Supreme Court’s ruling in these cases Affirmative action was first pursued in by the Supreme Court in order to increase opportunities to minorities that at one point in history had been denied to them.
Affirmative Action Essay. Counter arguments, Disproving other side, Con affirmative action Affirmative Action has been a long debated issue in United States. One group believes affirmative action should be abolished and other group thinks it serves an essential purpose.
Oct 17, · To Finally Abolish Affirmative Action, All Americans Should Check The Minority Box Bill Frezza Contributor i Opinions expressed by. One group believes affirmative action should be abolished and other group thinks it serves an essential purpose.
Our group believes Affirmative Action is fair and we still need it to eliminate discrimination and establish inequality to make our country is a better place. Affirmative action in higher education should be joeshammas.come admissions should be based on what the admissions board is looking for, not what the government says should be joeshammas.com this paper, I will present evidence to support that position.
Affirmative Action is defined as positive steps to enhance the diversity of some group, often to remedy the cumulative effect of subtle as well as gross expression of prejudice.
It is the practice of giving preference to racial minorities or women when hiring employees, giving awards or deciding /5(8).Download